< Previous Page Return to Title Page Next Page >

It's not just about P2P

  • While most of the "Network Neutrality" furor has focused on P2P, some more extreme advocates have also suggested banning:

    • Web caching (an acceleration mechanism that speeds up browsing)
    • Network address translation (a firewall technique that protects systems and conserves expensive Internet addresses)
    • Scanning for outbound SPAM
    • Blocking of outbound e-mail except from mail servers (SPAM prevention)
    • Display of informative messages in the user's Web browser window
    • Tiered pricing of Internet connections (economically infeasible)
    • Cutting off connections that violate user's contract with ISP via TCP reset ("RST") packets, an effective technique misleadingly branded as "forgery"

  • Every one of these demands to micromanage and regulate ISPs could create security risks, degrade performance, and/or prevent necessary management

  • Only by returning to the original definition of Network Neutrality (absence of anticompetitive behavior) can we avoid adverse consequences